JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon responded to an analyst question on last week’s earnings call by railing against political gridlock and public policy that continues to be a drag on business growth. And that, in turn, hurts the nation’s economy and the prosperity of the American people.

“We have become one of the most bureaucratic, confusing, litigious societies on the planet,” he said. “It’s almost an embarrassment being an American citizen traveling around the world and listening to the stupid s— we have to deal with in this country.”

Dimon gets no argument from me; I’ve been beating the drum about the overwhelming regulatory burden businesses face and the interrelationship between economic, corporate and wage growth for eons. They’re all interconnected. That’s just common sense.

The notion that everyday Americans don’t benefit from corporate tax and regulatory reform is ludicrous. Don’t even get me started on entitlement, immigration, healthcare, energy and environmental policy. We need “all of the above” reform to unleash America’s full economic growth potential, which benefits everyone.

Sadly, that’s not going to happen because of two words: perpetual gridlock. Washington has become so partisan that even a business-friendly administration ends up spending years fighting upstream to undo all the onerous rules and regulations of its predecessor. Talk about inefficient. These pendulum swings are productivity and prosperity killers.

I have no problem with a two-party system, but both sides are supposed to embrace economic growth. You know, capitalism. America wasn’t built on democracy alone. It was built on democracy and free-market capitalism. That’s how we became the most powerful nation on Earth. That’s not debatable; it’s historical fact.

Both sides are also supposed to act on behalf of their constituents. That means hundreds of millions of Americans, not just political activists, agitators and attorneys who are all bought and paid for by powerful right and left-wing extremists. Our political leaders are more interested in sensational sound bites and grandstanding to grab media attention than doing what’s right for those they serve.

It would be one thing if Congressional leaders were doing their jobs, but they’re not. What incentivizes people to perform? Competition. Lack of competition breeds bureaucracy and incentivizes the kind of dysfunctional behavior we’re seeing. Clearly, we need more competition on Capital Hill. It’s time we put an end to career politicians and their perpetual ruling class. It’s time for Congressional term limits.

If Donald Trump wants to prove he’s the kind of leader who is actually capable of draining the swamp instead of just wallowing around in it, he should rally the American people to put an end to career politicians. Term limits would be a lasting legacy worthy of our first outsider in the White House. Put those tweets to good use, Mr. President. If you really want to fix Washington, Congressional term limits would be one hell-of-a start.

Image credit elycefeliz via Flickr

  • Monty Gry

    We already have term limits, it is the ballot box. But the game is rigged. Almost impossible to vote out an incumbent. They have the name, powerful war chests, power to bring money into the district at crucial times. What the problem is that that OFFICE has become too powerful. Little princes and princesses with other worldly power. I put the responsibility on the VOTERS, but I could be talked into term limits. Funny that several guys have RUN on imposing term limits…yet once they get there…they continue to run. Everyone gets intoxicated with power. Diminish the POWER of the federal government and we might see guys quit. I have a dream.

  • James T

    Term limits and The Fair Tax- tax everyone EQUALLY, no other form of taxation allowed. The gov learns to spend within their limits or we downsize the gov, we’ve got more representatives than we have representation right now. When congress was created, we needed people to represent us, in this day and age, we have to elect people to represent us and then donate to the cause for which they were elected in order to maybe get it done. It’s no longer necessary with the internet, we can let the public vote on every issue and do away with congress as far as I’m concerned. They’ve been a huge waste of money.
    james t

    • Steve Tobak

      Hmm … getting rid of the representative government is a big leap. Not sure if that’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater or not. Besides, we still need lawmakers, etc.

      • James T

        I’d let the governors meet 3-4 times a year to press the needs of their states and introduce legislation. If they can get the body of Americans to agree that this state or the other needs special consideration, so be it. Returning power to the states and returning the federal gov to their original charges, ( protect and defend our borders, constitution, regulate commerce between the states and regulate commerce with other countries) will greatly reduce the $ that the federal gov requires as well. I’ve been told (and I’ve not fact checked this point) that most of our lawmakers don’t even draft the bills they propose, they have lobbyists doing that. So, If done correctly, we’d actually wind up with a more correct representation of the American People at far less expense.

  • “Libertarian” Peter Thiel HATES “competition.” He argues for Monopoly. Shall I cite the exact sections of his book “Zero to One”?